KOI HERPES VIRUS – SHOULD WE BE WORRIED
 
The mere mention of KHV is normally enough to drive fear and dread into the hearts and minds of most koikeepers particularly if there is any indication that your own koi are affected by this deadly and indiscriminate killer.  It was only a few short years back that KHV emerged within the hobby as a major potential health threat.
 
  One of the first instances that came to my attention was of a koikeeper in England who had purchased koi from a particular dealer and then had a wipe out of most of his koi collection due to KHV (Koi Herpes Virus).  This hobbyist was so incensed by the reluctance of the supplying koi dealer to accept responsibility for supplying koi infected with KHV that the matter went to Court and the hobbyist documented the whole account of the court case on a web site.  It made for interesting reading with all the claims and counter claims and expert witnesses being called to give evidence.  Little did I realise at the time that this new threat to the wellbeing of our koi would gradually become as prominent a health issue as it is today.
 
Now in Autumn 2006 I read regular reports on internet bulletin boards of hobbyists experiencing massive koi losses through KHV, reports and rumours of dealers affected and only a couple of weeks ago indications that KHV has now been reported among certain breeders in both the north and south of Japan. It has been well reported that Momotaro Koi Farm experienced a KHV outbreak in Autumn 2005 which was a major shock to the industry given their reputation as one of the top breeders in Japan.  Their outbreak was a major set back for me as at the time, I had three koi at Momotaro that had been purchased (via Yume Koi) and had been left to grow on.  All three had been purchased some time before as 9 to 12 month old tosai and at the time of the outbreak two were three year old sansai (expected to be around 28 inches) and one was a two year old nissai (expected to be around 24 inches).  I was intending to have them harvested and brought home during 2006 and was looking forward to checking out whether their growth and development had turned out as well as I had initially hoped at the time of purchase.  Unfortunately I was not destined to enjoy these koi as I was devastated to learn that all three were lost to the Momotaro KHV problem.
 
Although not legally obliged to replace these koi (as koi left to grow on at breeders are usually left at the owner’s risk) I was pleased to learn that Momotaro would provide replacements. However it took them all of last Autumn and Winter to test their koi stocks for KHV, identify and cull affected koi and resume trading by which time all surviving stocks were due to be placed back out in the mud ponds for the 2006 growing season. I was therefore unlikely to be offered replacements until Autumn 2006 at the earliest.
 
An early resolution to the replacement issue was found when Mike Snaden of Yume Koi (the dealer through whom I had purchased the koi) kindly offered replacements from his own stocks.  However just to prove that lightening can strike twice in the same place, within days of selecting replacements with Mike my new koi were caught up in the KHV outbreak that devastated Yume Koi following their return from the BKKS National Show in June. Fortunately I had not yet collected the koi otherwise KHV would surely have been introduced to my home koi stocks – a lucky escape as it turned out although having this second group of koi involved in a KHV outbreak did not make me feel very lucky at the time. 
 
During my two run ins with KHV I found there was a general lack of available literature about the virus and in some quarters a tendency for misunderstanding and mis-information surrounding this nasty virus. For information I list below some of the key bits of information I’ve managed to gather over the last year:-
 
One of the difficulties with KHV is that initial signs are often similar to a number of other more frequently experienced koi related ailments. However rapid and frequent koi mortalities will inevitably follow and it should become fairly obvious that something other than normal parasite or bacterial issues are involved.  Unfortunately by the time KHV is suspected it will be too late in most instances to prevent losses. Diagnosis cannot be confirmed at home or by professional vets.  Specialist laboratories or koi health consultants will need to be engaged.
 
There are two fundamentally different laboratory tests currently available to test for KHV:-
 
PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) tests have been available since 2002 and are carried out on tissue samples.  The test will establish if suspect koi have contracted KHV.  Unfortunately any suspect koi (if not already dead) submitted for PCR test must be killed in order to obtain the samples so the PCR test may not be appropriate if it is one of your favourite koi that you suspect may have the virus unless you are prepared to sacrifice it to obtain confirmation one way or the other.
 
A more recently developed test is the ELISA (Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay) test which examines a blood sample taken from suspect live koi and will establish if the koi has developed antibodies to the virus. Any koi that has been exposed to the active virus will develop antibodies so a negative ELISA test is confirmation that the koi has not been exposed to KHV and is clear of the virus.  By contrast a positive ELISA test does not automatically mean the koi is infected with KHV but it indicates that it has been exposed to the virus at some point and should be considered as a possible carrier with potential to transmit the virus at some later stage if triggered to become active.
 
Both the PCR and ELISA tests are available in the UK from organisations such as CEFAS a specialist laboratory testing facility based in Weymouth which is part of DEFRA.  In fact CEFAS undertook the hundreds of ELISA tests performed on all of the Yume koi during their KHV Summer outbreak. This included tests carried out on my three replacement koi referred to above, one of which tested negative on two separate occasions providing the confidence for me to collect the koi a couple of weeks ago.  Unfortunately my other two koi tested positive and were part of the seventy or so koi that Mike Snaden was forced to euthanize.
 
Unfortunately the ELISA test is not currently available in Japan so while the koi farms may be using PCR tests on koi suspected of KHV there must remain some questions about whether dormant KHV carrier koi are passing through the koi farms undetected for onward sale and transmission to UK dealers and hobbyists.  I’m not trying to frighten everyone from buying new koi from dealers as I’m sure most stocks will be free of KHV if purchased from reputable and identifiable sources. However until effective KHV vaccines are available, I will certainly have more confidence in buying koi that have been subjected to an ELISA blood test and shown to be negative. In the meantime my latest acquisition from Yume Koi should be clear of KHV if the available reported science is correct.  It’s now in my main pond, with the rest of my koi and so far appears to be in disgustingly good health - so was it a sensible move to introduce this koi – only time will tell.
 
Please note that since I’m not scientifically or medically trained I do not claim to be an expert on KHV. The above information has been gathered from various sources and represents the facts and current science as currently available.  Further information for those who are interested may be obtained from:-
CEFAS – www.cefastechnology.co.uk
Duncan Griffiths – www.koiquest.co.uk/fc1.htm
Associated Koi Clubs of America – www.akcaprojectkhv.org
 
I’d like thank Rob  for this article – there’s nothing better than one of our members being able to pass on first hand experience.